The thrust of The Hurt Locker story is the character. \u00a0The team sergeant who is reckless and who goes back to the war again and again when he doesn’t have to. That’s compelling, it’s a true character trait. I could relate. It let me examine things about myself and about soldiers in general that do need examining.<\/p>\n
But while pursuing this central story, the writer tossed in either lie after lie, or mistake after mistake, that betrays a basic perception on his part that soldiers generally are casual murderers and liars. (Also that AK47s can hit accurately at more than 300 yards, EOD guys are all sniper qualified, EOD guys regularly run around the countryside completely alone and so forth.)<\/em> He’s in good company. Hollywood has been promulgating this line of\u00a0propaganda\u00a0since at least VietNam.<\/p>\n On the whole, I liked The Hurt Locker. \u00a0The good part of the story, the character arc, could easily have been told without the lies and\/or mistakes though.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The thrust of The Hurt Locker story is the character. \u00a0The team sergeant who is reckless and who goes back to the war again and again when he doesn’t have to. That’s compelling, it’s a true character trait. I could relate. It let me examine things about myself and about soldiers in general that do … Continue reading The Hurt Locker<\/span>